EPD-IES-0008806:001

Test compiler authl

General information

EPD Owner	SigmaTest
Registration number	EPD-IES-0008806:001
PCR	PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804:A2) (1.2.4)
Status	Expired
Publication date	2024-10-23
Valid until	2024-10-31
EN 15804 compliant	Yes
Geographical scope	Global

Product images

Programme information

Programme	International EPD System
Address	EPD International AB Box 210 60 SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden
Website	www.environdec.com
E-mail	support@environdec.com

Product category rules

CEN standard EN 15804 serves as the Core Product Category Rules (PCR)
Product Category Rules (PCR)	PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804:A2) (1.2.4)
PCR review was conducted by	PCR review was conducted by: The Technical Committee of the International EPD System. See www.environdec.com for a list of members. Review chair: Claudia A. Peña, University of Concepción, Chile. The review panel may be contacted via the Secretariat www.environdec.com/support.

Verification

LCA accountability	Eduard Sheliemietiev, eduard.sheliemietiev@aaa.sigma.software.aaa, SigmaTest
Independent third-party verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025:2006, via	EPD verification through an individual EPD verification EPD verification through EPD Process Certification* EPD verification through a pre-verified LCA/EPD tool
Procedure for follow-up of data during EPD validity involves third party verifier	Yes No
*EPD Process Certification involves an accredited certification body certifying and periodically auditing the EPD process and conducting external and independent verification of EPDs that are regularly published. More information can be found in the General Programme Instructions on www.envrondec.com.

Ownership and limitation on use of EPD

Limitations

EPDs within the same product category but registered in different EPD programmes may not be comparable. For two EPDs to be comparable, they shall be based on the same PCR (including the same version number up to the first two digits) or be based on fully-aligned PCRs or versions of PCRs; cover products with identical functions, technical performances and use (e.g. identical declared/functional units); have equivalent system boundaries and descriptions of data; apply equivalent data quality requirements, methods of data collection, and allocation methods; apply identical cut-off rules and impact assessment methods (including the same version of characterisation factors); have equivalent content declarations; and be valid at the time of comparison.

Ownership

The EPD Owner has the sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.

Information about EPD Owner

EPD Owner	SigmaTest
Contact person name	Eduard Sheliemietiev
Contact person e-mail	eduard.sheliemietiev@sigma.software
Organisation address	Ukraine fsd 78 345

Description of the organisation of the EPD Owner

sdfgh

Organisation logo

Product information

Product name	kj
Product identification	jl,
Product description	jk
Manufacturing or service provision description	jkl
Material properties	Area density (kg/m²), 87
Production site	Albania fsdj 345
Production site 2	Albania gdf 534
UN CPC code	01111. Wheat, seed
GTIN	56
Product classification system	Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) 89.1
Geographical scope	Global
Geographical scope description	jkl
Actual or technical lifespan	43 years

Content declaration

Explanation why content declaration is not relevant

Hazardous and toxic Substances
Hazardous/Toxic substances from the candidate list	EC No.	CAS No.	Weight per functional or declared unit %
Phenol, methylstyrenated	270-966-8	68512-30-1	44

LCA information

EPD based on declared or functional unit	Functional unit
Functional unit description	kkj
Reference flow	k;k Area (m²), 6
Conversion factor to mass	6
Are infrastructure or capital goods included in any upstream, core or downstream processes?	Yes No
Detailed description of infrastructure and capital goods
Datasources used for this EPD
LCA Software	y7 jhk
Version of the EN 15804 reference package	EF Reference Package 3.0
Technology description including background system	ip
Scrap (recycled material) inputs contribution level	More than 10% of the GWP-GHG results in modules A1-A3 come from scrap inputs

Scrap (recycled material) inputs data
Material scrap name	Material scrap value
gfd	5, kg CO₂ eq./tonne
The share of the total scrap input that was assumed to come with an environmental burden	5%

Electricity data
Electricity used in the manufacturing process in A3
Type of electricity mix	Specific electricity mix as generated, or purchased from an electricity supplier, demonstrated by a contractual instrument
Energy sources	Hydro	8%
	Wind	6%
	Solar	6%
	Biomass	8%
	Geothermal	6%
	Waste	6%
	Nuclear	6%
	Natural gas	6%
	Coal	6%
	Oil	6%
	Peat	6%
	Other	6%
GWP-GHG intensity (kg CO₂ eq./kWh)	6 kg CO₂ eq./kWh

System boundary

Description of the system boundary	Cradle to gate with modules C1-C4 and module D (A1-A3 + C + D).
Excluded modules	Yes, there is an excluded module, or there are excluded modules
Justification for the omission of modules	kl

Declared modules

	Product stage			Construction process stage		Use stage							End of life stage				Beyond product life cycle
	Raw material supply	Transport	Manufacturing	Transport to site	Construction installation	Use	Maintenance	Repair	Replacement	Refurbishment	Operational energy use	Operational water use	De-construction demolition	Transport	Waste processing	Disposal	Reuse-Recovery-Recycling-potential
Module	A1	A2	A3	A4	A5	B1	B2	B3	B4	B5	B6	B7	C1	C2	C3	C4	D
Modules declared	X	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND	ND
Geography	Africa	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Share of specific data	6%					-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Variation - products	6%					-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Variation - sites	6%					-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Description of the process flow diagram(s)

Scenarios

Name of the default scenario	fs
Description of the default scenario	fds

Results

Mandatory environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact category	Indicator	Unit	A1-A3	C1	C2	C3	C4	D
Climate change - total	GWP-total	kg CO₂ eq.	6.61E+0	ND	1.91E-6	0.00E+0	5.25E-5	0.00E+0
Climate change - fossil	GWP-fossil	kg CO₂ eq.	7.64E+0	ND	9.83E-2	0.00E+0	1.20E+0	0.00E+0
Climate change - biogenic	GWP-biogenic	kg CO₂ eq.	-1.04E+0	ND	9.82E-2	0.00E+0	4.05E-1	0.00E+0
Climate change - land use and land-use change	GWP-luluc	kg CO₂ eq.	1.33E-2	ND	2.94E-5	0.00E+0	7.98E-1	0.00E+0
Ozone depletion	ODP	kg CFC-11 eq.	2.58E-7	ND	2.10E-9	0.00E+0	4.47E-10	0.00E+0
Acidification	AP	mol H⁺ eq.	3.36E-2	ND	1.18E-4	0.00E+0	3.64E-4	0.00E+0
Eutrophication aquatic freshwater	EP-freshwater	kg P eq.	3.34E-4	ND	7.65E-8	0.00E+0	1.30E-6	0.00E+0
Eutrophication aquatic marine	EP-marine	kg N eq.	9.36E-3	ND	2.79E-5	0.00E+0	4.74E-3	0.00E+0
Eutrophication terrestrial	EP-terrestrial	mol N eq.	6.95E-2	ND	2.73E-4	0.00E+0	1.47E-3	0.00E+0
Photochemical ozone formation	POCP	kg NMVOC eq.	2.65E-2	ND	2.22E-4	0.00E+0	5.13E-4	0.00E+0
Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metals	ADP-minerals&metals¹, ²	kg Sb eq.	2.20E-5	ND	3.35E-9	0.00E+0	1.50E-9	0.00E+0
Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuels	ADP-fossil¹	MJ, net calorific value	1.23E+2	ND	1.29E+0	0.00E+0	5.80E-1	0.00E+0
Water use	WDP¹	m³ world eq. deprived	4.92E+0	ND	1.19E-3	0.00E+0	4.39E-3	0.00E+0
Acronyms	GWP-fossil = Global Warming Potential fossil fuels; GWP-biogenic = Global Warming Potential biogenic; GWP-luluc = Global Warming Potential land use and land use change; ODP = Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer; AP = Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance; EP-freshwater = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching freshwater end compartment; EP-marine = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching marine end compartment; EP-terrestrial = Eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance; POCP = Formation potential of tropospheric ozone; ADP-minerals&metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources; ADP-fossil = Abiotic depletion for fossil resources potential; WDP = Water (user) deprivation potential, deprivation-weighted water consumption
Disclaimer 1	The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator
Disclaimer 2	The results of the impact categories abiotic depletion of minerals and metals may be highly uncertain in LCAs that include capital goods/infrastructure in generic datasets, in case infrastructure/capital goods contribute greatly to the total results. This is because the LCI data of infrastructure/capital goods used to quantify these indicators in currently available generic datasets sometimes lack temporal, technological and geographical representativeness. Caution should be exercised when using the results of these indicators for decision-making purposes.

Additional mandatory environmental performance indicators

Impact category	Indicator	Unit	A1-A3	C1	C2	C3	C4	D
Climate change - GWP-GHG	GWP-GHG¹	kg CO₂ eq.	7.65E+0	ND	9.82E-2	0.00E+0	4.05E-1	0.00E+0
Acronyms	GWP-GHG = Global warming potential greenhouse gas.
Disclaimer 1	The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO₂ is set to zero.

Additional voluntary environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804

Impact category	Indicator	Unit	A1-A3	A4	A5
Particulate matter emissions	PM	Disease incidence	1.00E+0	1.00E+0	1.00E+0
Ionizing radiation - human health	IRP¹	kBq U235 eq.	1.00E+0
Eco-toxicity - freshwater	ETP-fw², ³	CTUe	1.00E+0
Human toxicity - cancer effects	HTP-c², ³	CTUh	1.00E+0
Human toxicity - non-cancer effects	HTP-nc², ³	CTUh	1.00E+0
Land-use related impacts/soil quality	SQP², ³	Dimensionless	1.00E+0
Acronyms	PM = Potential incidence of disease due to particulate matter emissions; IRP = Potential human exposure efficiency relative to U235; ETP-fw = Potential comparative toxic unit for ecosystems; HTP-c = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; HTP-nc = Potential comparative toxic unit for humans; SQP = Potential soil quality index.
Disclaimer 1	This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
Disclaimer 2	The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator.
Disclaimer 3	The results of the impact categories land use, human toxicity (cancer), human toxicity, noncancer and ecotoxicity (freshwater) may be highly uncertain in LCAs that include capital goods/infrastructure in generic datasets, in case infrastructure/capital goods contribute greatly to the total results. This is because the LCI data of infrastructure/capital goods used to quantify these indicators in currently available generic datasets sometimes lack temporal, technological and geographical representativeness. Caution should be exercised when using the results of these indicators for decision-making purposes.

Resource use indicators according to EN 15804

Indicator	Unit	A1-A3	C1	C2	C3	C4	D
PERE	MJ, net calorific value	8.31E+1	ND	3.40E-3	0.00E+0	4.27E-2	0.00E+0
PERM	MJ, net calorific value	7.42E+0	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
PERT	MJ, net calorific value	9.05E+1	ND	3.40E-3	0.00E+0	4.27E-2	0.00E+0
PENRE	MJ, net calorific value	1.22E+2	ND	1.29E+0	0.00E+0	5.80E-1	0.00E+0
PENRM	MJ, net calorific value	1.05E-1	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
PENRT	MJ, net calorific value	1.23E+2	ND	1.29E+0	0.00E+0	5.80E-1	0.00E+0
SM	kg	4.38E-1	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
RSF	MJ, net calorific value	1.12E+1	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
NRSF	MJ, net calorific value	0.00E+0	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
FW	m³	1.20E-1	ND	2.49E-5	0.00E+0	1.75E-4	0.00E+0
Acronyms	PERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy re-sources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Use of net fresh water.

Waste indicators according to EN 15804

Indicator	Unit	A1-A3	C1	C2	C3	C4	D
HWD	kg	1.83E-4	ND	8.55E-6	0.00E+0	2.15E-6	0.00E+0
NHWD	kg	7.63E-1	ND	6.39E-5	0.00E+0	4.40E+0	0.00E+0
RWD	kg	8.88E-5	ND	1.11E-7	0.00E+0	8.80E-7	0.00E+0
Acronyms	HWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed.

Output flow indicators according to EN 15804

Indicator	Unit	A1-A3	C1	C2	C3	C4	D
CRU	kg	0.00E+0	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
MFR	kg	3.46E-2	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
MER	kg	3.86E-1	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
EEE	MJ, net calorific value	0.00E+0	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
EET	MJ, net calorific value	0.00E+0	ND	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0	0.00E+0
Acronyms	CRU = Components for re-use; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy.