General information
| EPD Owner | YuTest Dev |
|---|---|
| Registration number | EPD-IES-0009547:002 |
| PCR | PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804:A2) (1.2.4) |
| Status | Valid |
| Publication date | 2025-05-20 |
| Valid until | 2029-11-09 |
| EN 15804 compliant | Yes |
| Geographical scope | Nordic countries, Colombia, Scandinavia |
Programme information
| Programme | International EPD System |
|---|---|
| Address | EPD International AB Box 210 60 SE-100 31 Stockholm Sweden |
| Website | www.environdec.com |
| support@environdec.com |
Product category rules
| CEN standard EN 15804 and ISO standard ISO 21930 serve as the core Product Category Rules (PCR) | |
| Product Category Rules (PCR) | PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804:A2) (1.2.4) |
|---|---|
| PCR review was conducted by | PCR review was conducted by: The Technical Committee of the International EPD System. See www.environdec.com for a list of members. Review chair: Claudia A. Peña, University of Concepción, Chile. The review panel may be contacted via the Secretariat www.environdec.com/support. |
| Complementary Product Category Rules (c-PCR) | PCR 2019:14-c-PCR-001 c-PCR-001 Cement and building lime (EN 16908) (2022-05-18) Version: 1.2.4 |
| c-PCR review was conducted by | The Technical Committee of the International EPD System |
Verification
| LCA accountability | YuTest LCA Pract, yuliia.karpenko+lca@sigma.software, YuTest Dev |
|---|---|
| Independent third-party verification of the declaration and data, according to ISO 14025:2006, via | |
| Third-party verifier | Bureau Veritas Certification Sverige AB |
| Accredited by | SWEDAC |
| Accredited certification body address | Sweden |
| Procedure for follow-up of data during EPD validity involves third party verifier | |
| *EPD Process Certification involves an accredited certification body certifying and periodically auditing the EPD process and conducting external and independent verification of EPDs that are regularly published. More information can be found in the General Programme Instructions on www.envrondec.com. | |
Ownership and limitation on use of EPD
Limitations
EPDs within the same product category but registered in different EPD programmes may not be comparable. For two EPDs to be comparable, they shall be based on the same PCR (including the same version number up to the first two digits) or be based on fully-aligned PCRs or versions of PCRs; cover products with identical functions, technical performances and use (e.g. identical declared/functional units); have equivalent system boundaries and descriptions of data; apply equivalent data quality requirements, methods of data collection, and allocation methods; apply identical cut-off rules and impact assessment methods (including the same version of characterisation factors); have equivalent content declarations; and be valid at the time of comparison.
Ownership
The EPD Owner has the sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.
Information about EPD Owner
| EPD Owner | YuTest Dev |
|---|---|
| Contact person name | Yuliia Karpenko DEV |
| Contact person e-mail | yuliia.karpenko+dev@sigma.software |
| Organisation address | Belize t 243565 tt ttt |
Description of the organisation of the EPD Owner
test
Organisation images
Organisation logo
Additional documents
Product information
Test 1
| Product name | Test 1 |
|---|---|
| Product identification | test |
| Product description | e |
| Product information from external sources | s |
| Technical purpose of product | ee |
| Manufacturing or service provision description | rs |
| Material properties | Flexural strength (MPa), 4 Area density (kg/m2), 9.23 Bulk density (kg/m3), 34 Sound Insulation (dB), 12.34568 |
| Production site | site1 Albania e 6543 1 2 |
| UN CPC code | 0. Agriculture, forestry and fishery products |
| GTIN | 234567654 |
| Geographical scope | Nordic countries, Colombia, Scandinavia |
Product images
Test 2
| Product name | Test 2 |
|---|---|
| Product identification | test |
| Product description | e |
| Product information from external sources | s |
| Technical purpose of product | ee |
| Manufacturing or service provision description | rs |
| Material properties | Flexural strength (MPa), 4 Area density (kg/m2), 9.23 Bulk density (kg/m3), 34 Sound Insulation (dB), 12.34568 |
| Production site | site1 Albania e 6543 1 2 |
| UN CPC code | 0. Agriculture, forestry and fishery products |
| GTIN | 234567654 |
| Geographical scope | Nordic countries, Colombia, Scandinavia |
Product images
Technical characteristics and performance
c-PCR-001: Cement and building lime
| Product name | Type category | Type category | Type category | Type category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Technical performance
| Product name | Type category | Type category | Type category | Type category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 22 | 33 | 44 | 55 |
Content declaration
Explanation why content declaration is not relevant
test
| Product content | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content name | Weight, kg | Post-consumer recycled material, weight-% of product | Biogenic material, weight-% of product | Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit or product | Biogenic material kg CO2, eq./declared unit or product |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 18.33 |
| Total | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 18.33 |
| Note1 | 1 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2 | ||||
| Packaging materials | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material name | Weight, kg | Weight-% (versus the product) | Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit or product | Biogenic material kg CO2, eq./declared unit or product |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 33 |
| Total | 7 | 8 | 9 | 33 |
| Note1 | 1 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2 | |||
| Hazardous and toxic Substances | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hazardous/Toxic substances from the candidate list | EC No. | CAS No. | Weight per functional or declared unit % |
| reaction mass of: triphenylthiophosphate and tertiary butylated phenyl derivatives | 421-820-9 | 192268-65-8 | 6 |
Best-case product
| Product name | test |
|---|
| Product content | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content name | Weight, kg | Post-consumer recycled material, weight-% of product | Biogenic material, weight-% of product | Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit or product | Biogenic material kg CO2, eq./declared unit or product |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Note1 | 1 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2 | ||||
| Packaging materials | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material name | Weight, kg | Weight-% (versus the product) | Biogenic material1, kg C/declared unit or product | Biogenic material kg CO2, eq./declared unit or product |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Note1 | 1 kg biogenic carbon is equivalent to 44/12 kg of CO2 | |||
LCA information
| EPD based on declared or functional unit | Declared unit |
|---|---|
| Declared unit and reference flow | ewtr Length (m), 56344 |
| Conversion factor to mass | 5645 |
| Are infrastructure or capital goods included in any upstream, core or downstream processes? | |
| Datasources used for this EPD | |
| LCA Software | SimaPro SimaPro 9.5 |
| Version of the EN 15804 reference package | EF Reference Package 3.1 |
| Technology description including background system | test |
| Scrap (recycled material) inputs contribution level | More than 10% of the GWP-GHG results in modules A1-A3 come from scrap inputs |
Description of data quality assessment and reference years
test
| Data quality assessment and reference years | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process name | Source type | Source | Reference year | Data category | Share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 2025-05-20 - 2025-05-22 | 33 | 8% |
| Total share of primary data, of GWP-GHG results for A1-A3 | 8% | ||||
| The share of primary data is calculated based on GWP-GHG results. It is a simplified indicator for data quality that do not capture all relevant aspects of data quality. The indicator is not comparable across product categories. | |||||
| Scrap (recycled material) inputs data | |
|---|---|
| Material scrap name | Material scrap value |
| 567876 | 33, kg CO2 eq./tonne |
| The share of the total scrap input that was assumed to come with an environmental burden | |
| Electricity data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Electricity used in the manufacturing process in A3 | ||
| Type of electricity mix | Residual electricity mix of the electricity supplier on the market | |
| Energy sources | Hydro | 0% |
| Wind | 0% | |
| Solar | 0% | |
| Biomass | 0% | |
| Geothermal | 3% | |
| Waste | 0% | |
| Nuclear | 44% | |
| Natural gas | 4% | |
| Coal | 4% | |
| Oil | 5% | |
| Peat | 0% | |
| Other | 0% | |
| GWP-GHG intensity (kg CO2 eq./kWh) | 86 kg CO2 eq./kWh | |
| CO2 uptake associated with carbonation and its assumptions | ||
|---|---|---|
| Production stage (module A) | 56 | |
| Use stage (module B) | 65 | |
| End-of-Life stage (module C) | Excluded | |
| Beyond product life cycle (Module D) | Excluded | |
System boundary
| Description of the system boundary | Cradle to gate (A1-A3). |
|---|---|
| Excluded modules | Yes, there is an excluded module, or there are excluded modules |
| Justification for the omission of modules | test |
Declared modules
| Product stage | Construction process stage | Use stage | End of life stage | Beyond product life cycle | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw material supply | Transport | Manufacturing | Transport to site | Construction installation | Use | Maintenance | Repair | Replacement | Refurbishment | Operational energy use | Operational water use | De-construction demolition | Transport | Waste processing | Disposal | Reuse-Recovery-Recycling-potential | |
| Module | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
| Modules declared | X | X | X | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Geography | Global | Africa | Africa | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Share of specific data | 67% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| Variation - products | 56% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| Variation - sites | 55% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
Scenarios
| Name of the default scenario | Test scenario |
|---|---|
| Description of the default scenario | Descr 1 |
Additional scenarios
| Name of the additional scenario | Scenario 2 |
|---|---|
| Description of the additional scenario | Test |
Additional scenarios
| Name of the additional scenario | tst |
|---|---|
| Description of the additional scenario | etws |
Results
Mandatory environmental performance indicators according to EN 15804
| Impact category | Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Climate change - total | GWP-total | kg CO2 eq. | 6.77E+2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Climate change - fossil | GWP-fossil | kg CO2 eq. | 4.97E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Climate change - biogenic | GWP-biogenic | kg CO2 eq. | 2.17E-1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Climate change - land use and land-use change | GWP-luluc | kg CO2 eq. | 6.82E+2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Ozone depletion | ODP | kg CFC-11 eq. | 1.42E-5 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Acidification | AP | mol H+ eq. | 2.33E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Eutrophication aquatic freshwater | EP-freshwater | kg P eq. | 1.35E-1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Eutrophication aquatic marine | EP-marine | kg N eq. | 5.75E-1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Eutrophication terrestrial | EP-terrestrial | mol N eq. | 5.65E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Photochemical ozone formation | POCP | kg NMVOC eq. | 2.38E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Depletion of abiotic resources - minerals and metals | ADP-minerals&metals1 | kg Sb eq. | 2.58E-3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Depletion of abiotic resources - fossil fuels | ADP-fossil1 | MJ, net calorific value | 8.47E+3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Water use | WDP1 | m3 world eq. deprived | 2.04E+2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Acronyms | GWP-fossil = Global Warming Potential fossil fuels; GWP-biogenic = Global Warming Potential biogenic; GWP-luluc = Global Warming Potential land use and land use change; ODP = Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer; AP = Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance; EP-freshwater = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching freshwater end compartment; EP-marine = Eutrophication potential, fraction of nutrients reaching marine end compartment; EP-terrestrial = Eutrophication potential, Accumulated Exceedance; POCP = Formation potential of tropospheric ozone; ADP-minerals&metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources; ADP-fossil = Abiotic depletion for fossil resources potential; WDP = Water (user) deprivation potential, deprivation-weighted water consumption | ||||||||||||||||
| Disclaimer 1 | The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties of these results are high or as there is limited experience with the indicator | ||||||||||||||||
Additional mandatory environmental performance indicators
| Impact category | Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Climate change - GWP-GHG | GWP-GHG1 | kg CO2 eq. | 6.79E+2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Acronyms | GWP-GHG = Global warming potential greenhouse gas. | ||||||||||||||||
| Disclaimer 1 | The GWP-GHG indicator is termed GWP-IOBC/GHG in the ILCD+EPD+ data format. The indicator accounts for all greenhouse gases except biogenic carbon dioxide uptake and emissions and biogenic carbon stored in the product. As such, the indicator is identical to GWP-total except that the CF for biogenic CO2 is set to zero. | ||||||||||||||||
Resource use indicators according to EN 15804
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PERE | MJ, net calorific value | 6.67E+2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| PERM | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| PERT | MJ, net calorific value | 6.67E+2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| PENRE | MJ, net calorific value | 8.47E+3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| PENRM | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| PENRT | MJ, net calorific value | 8.47E+3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| SM | kg | 9.57E+2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| RSF | MJ, net calorific value | 9.12E+1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| NRSF | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| FW | m3 | 5.54E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Acronyms | PERE = Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERM = Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PERT = Total use of renewable primary energy resources; PENRE = Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRM = Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials; PENRT = Total use of non-renewable primary energy re-sources; SM = Use of secondary material; RSF = Use of renewable secondary fuels; NRSF = Use of non-renewable secondary fuels; FW = Use of net fresh water. | |||||||||||||||
Waste indicators according to EN 15804
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWD | kg | 3.25E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| NHWD | kg | 4.56E+2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| RWD | kg | 1.03E-2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Acronyms | HWD = Hazardous waste disposed; NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed; RWD = Radioactive waste disposed. | |||||||||||||||
Output flow indicators according to EN 15804
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRU | kg | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| MFR | kg | 1.73E+2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| MER | kg | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| EEE | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| EET | MJ, net calorific value | 0.00E+0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Acronyms | CRU = Components for re-use; MFR = Materials for recycling; MER = Materials for energy recovery; EEE = Exported electrical energy; EET = Exported thermal energy. | |||||||||||||||
Additional information
Version history
test LCA
References
test